Where there is a web, there is a Wall.

More about Danone vs Wahaha

In a former post I commented that Wahaha is playing a card named nationalism or nationalistic sympathy in its action of anti-Danone’s acquisition. Up to now all the messages in Chinese I read- including news, expert analysis and web-surfers’ comments can be grouped into standpoints as below:

1. Support Wahaha and criticize Danone

  • Wahaha is the pride of Chinese and China and should be protected by the government.
  • Danone set unfair terms in the contract and Wahaha fell victim.
  • Danone did not contribute much in Wahaha’s development and thus did not deserve ownership of the brand.
  • Danone’s ambition is to control the drink / milk industry and gains monopoly in the market, and thus should be stopped From open the door by owning Wahaha.

2. Sympathize Wahaha but insist on following business rules and laws

  • Follow the contract, the agreement, the rules and the law, however painful it is, do what a company in modern market economy should do.
  • Chinese companies, and the government as well, should learn From this lesson. (well, this is seen as a lesson :P )

I used to agree with point 2, of course, as point 1 stands neither logic or law. That is why I said in the former post that “China would move another great step forward on the way to market economy, if Danone won this game”.

The game, however, is not so simple, as I found out after reading some news in English as supplement.

1. Firstly, what are Danone and Wahaha fighting about? The acquisiton?

  • Not really. Zong’s story is that he is threatened by Danone on acquisition. The fuse is the name and trademark of “Wahaha”, and actually this has been and will be the only true trophy that the two parties are fighting for. Danone’s accusal against Wahaha is also about illegal trade mark usage.

2. Secondly, who owns the trademark?

  • According to this expert analysis From pure sense of law, over ten years ago, Wahaha did sign an agreement with Danone, according to which Wahaha licensing all rights to its name and other trademarks to the Danone-Wahaha joint venture. Thus, seemingly, Zong has no rights to use “Wahaha” in branch companies controlled by his family.
  • On the other hand, Zong also mentioned that the agreement need recording with the Chinese government to be effective in law, according to related government regulations. This step, however, somehow, failed. The government did not record the agreement, and thus it is invalid.
  • In conclusion, there is an agreement stating the trademark belongs to the joint-venture, neither Zong or Danone alone. But this agreement is invalid in law. Thus, none owns the trademark. (WOW~~)

3. Who trapped who?

  • Did Danone ever realized the necessity of the recording process? Was the failure of recording a coincidence or an intention?
  • Or the requirement of recording is not a must in law? Or Danone has a backup plan for this?
  • What is the lesson, and which side should learn From it?

The complexity of this case is that standers-by (like you and me) cannot get any clear information. On the internet, the news and messages in Chinese are all talking about rights and wrongs of nationalism, monopoly and industry protection. I just wonder. This is a LAW issue, isn’t it? It is about facts and rules, isn’t it? But few media in China take this point of view. The core question is whether the agreement without government approval is effective in law. Let’s wait and see.

Finally, I recommend this blog (and all the linked posts in it) as supplement reading on this case.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

More information (by Kitty, July 16, 2007)

The following information is From here (Wall Street journal in Chinese) . Seemingly though the trademark agreement in 1996 was not registered, Danone did notice the issue and sighed another contract with Wahaha to transfer the ownership of the “Wahaha” trademark From Wahaha Group to the Wahaha joint venture.

OK. Now, who trapped who?


|2|left



Related Posts:

comments

Comments are closed.

  • WANG Yixin

    3 years in FMCG
    2 years in Advertising
    1 year in IT startup
    Digital Marketing Now

  • Tags

  • Weibo& Twitter

    • 上学期终于消灭了70分。过90的四门课都是自己选的……所以当三好学生的秘诀就是不要有必修课吗??
    • 一定要幸福啊!!!
      安卓论坛 : 考试时候的准考证号,移动联通,你们终于在一起了。
    • 烙春饼 哈哈
    • 夏目友人帐 S4 04,闪烁着治愈光芒啊啊啊啊
    • 快冲着太阳广播下,看地球50年后还在不 :科学家发现最适宜人类居住的类地行星距地球22光年 http://t.cn/zOhOJmN
    • 栩栩如生啊!!!//@Ryan老刘:我怎么记得是@刘阿伦 闷的时候,会随便拨一个客户副总的电话,赶上哪个都行。提出一个Big Idea,把客户说晕。而他听着客户的称赞,不发一语,最后撂下一句:“这其实做不了”, 挂上电话,当没事儿发生过。突然觉得这TM才叫生活。//@刘阿伦: 名声在外。。。
      wangyixin : 他有时闲着闷了,会临时打开一个PPT,随便赶上哪个比稿就写哪个,不用草稿,独自冥想,不发一语,然后再回到厕所发呆,当没事发生过,突然觉得这才叫生活。[本贴向 @刘阿伦 致敬]
    • 说完,他的鼻子变成了一尺长 #毁段子练习#
      那些丶微小说 : 她是单纯的乡下女孩。尽管门不当户不对,他们还是相爱了。有一次他带她参加了高级聚会,摆在她面前的是精美的牛排,可是她完全不会用刀叉吃,她只能抓起牛排直接吃了。有的嘉宾在偷笑,有的很是惊讶。而他只是放下刀叉,学着她得样子拿起牛排吃了起来说“我们家习惯这样吃,因为这样的味道更鲜美!”.
    • 他有时闲着闷了,会临时打开一个PPT,随便赶上哪个比稿就写哪个,不用草稿,独自冥想,不发一语,然后再回到厕所发呆,当没事发生过,突然觉得这才叫生活。[本贴向 @刘阿伦 致敬]
    • 做了个萌属性测试(http://t.cn/htAmui),结果如下:“非常明顯,總共有99.9%的腹黑、40%的兄控或姊控、65%的成熟屬性(欲兄或御姊)、90%的一人樂,然後是絕絕對對的抖S攻,這是無敵準的,認命吧~~~” 【好像确实准……可是到底哪里看出来非常明显啊啊啊啊啊】
    • How do you explain to an innocent citizen of the free world the importance of a credit default swap on a double-A tranche of a subprime-backed collateralized debt obligation?how?how??
    • 喵!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!//@卢晓路: 一应教众免礼[哈哈]//@hr0210: 教主,仙福永享,一桶浆糊! //@一巫一:@卢晓路 恭贺喵呜教主,仙福永享,一桶浆糊![膜拜了]
      树梢熊 : 人民币里的真相。。喵呜神教。。@风_殇墨 @海都网 @耳东少爷alex @猫扑 @84剩女
    • 后来知道自己有梦想 后来以为自己做不到 后来看到别人做到了 此即没有后悔药的人生
    • 另外要说明一下,虽然公司业务是“带老外在北京吃喝玩乐”,但本职位招聘办公室经理,不是导游…… http://t.cn/zOPuGDH
    • 我输鸟,感谢大家踊跃参与,现在联系我的人数已经远超过我今晚人肉联系的能力范围。如果你对“带老外在北京吃喝玩乐公司”的办公室经理职位感兴趣,请移步这里阅读工作职责、招聘要求以及联系方式,务必看一眼最下方的红色提示。http://t.cn/zOPuGDH
    • 代发初级职位招聘启事:某外资旅游服务公司招聘运营助理,要求英语好、沟通能力强、踏实好学、最好稍微懂点财务记账,月薪4K起。该公司业务为让来京老外吃好喝好玩好,很有趣,不出差,且可以练口语。该职位适合刚毕业的大学生,嗯……京城吃货优先、京城玩家优先……有意者请私信我。请各路朋友帮转。
    • In memory of Prof. Snape.
    • 说不定,正是苹果毁掉了美国教育。习惯了通过宽松优越的方式获取信息,学生摄入不那么“人性化”的信息的能力就会越发退化。
      DamnDigital : #互动分享#Infographic: 苹果超人将拯救美国教育——从美国现今糟糕的教育状况说事,同时回顾了苹果公司的迄今为止的努力,看得出全世界的人们对于苹果进军教育界抱着是100%的期待与信心。http://t.cn/zOPTwXV
    • 虽然内容来源不同,网易Lofter的呈现形式可以与pinterest很接近。二者有异曲同工之妙。
    • There is no heaven on earth.
    • 了不起!!!!!@赵嘉敏//@陈昊芝:唐茶、Amazon US、也许还会有更多,祝贺嘉敏,祝贺yeeyan和东西团队 //@赵嘉敏: //
      爱范儿 : Amazon US 上中文电子书《红教堂》现身,Publisher 显示的是 Yeeyan,是本译作。下了第一章节试读,阅读体验没有太大惊喜,版式中规中矩。不过考虑到目前 Amazon 有超过 100 万本付费英语书籍,而简体中文的书籍寥寥无几,《红教堂》的登场是个不错的开始。这里附上截图和链接:http://t.cn/zOPyGOA